2026 Judicial Evaluation Survey
The 2026 Judicial Evaluation Survey has been reopened through September 23, 2026. Attorneys with relevant professional experience before judges of the 10th Judicial District have an additional opportunity to participate.
Your individualized survey link will arrive in a separate email from Tracey@brilliantnps.com. Please search for that email and check your other folders, including spam or junk, if you do not see it in your main inbox.
The Johnson County Bar Association conducts the Judicial Evaluation Survey for the 10th Judicial District, Johnson County, Kansas.
The judicial evaluation process provides attorneys with relevant professional experience before district court judges an opportunity to provide confidential feedback regarding judicial performance, professionalism, courtroom administration, and the administration of justice.
Please evaluate only judges with whom you have sufficient professional experience, including through in-person or virtual appearances or hearings. You do not need to evaluate every judge.
The survey is administered by an independent third party. Individual survey responses are confidential and are not provided to JoCo Bar staff, Board members, or judges.
Already completed the survey? Thank you. Your responses have been retained and remain part of the survey results. A previously used survey link will not allow another response.
If you cannot locate your individualized survey link, please contact info@jocobar.org . JoCo Bar can work with the survey administrator to assist with delivery, including sending the link to an alternate email address if needed.
The survey will close on September 23, 2026. Results will be compiled and published after the survey closes.
Questions regarding the judicial evaluation process may be directed to:
Tana Griffith
Executive Director
Johnson County Bar Association
tgriffith@jocobar.org
(913) 544-1130
About the historical results: The scope, distribution method, and information retained for the judicial evaluation survey have varied by year. Each summary reflects the courts evaluated and the survey information available for that particular year.